Answering Obama?s Israel Lies no comments

On January 19, President Barack Obama?s campaign staff released a video, ?America and Israel: An Unbreakable Bond? ? a piece rife with half-truths and distortions. As patently false as it seems to anyone with a properly jaundiced eye, it nonetheless requires a response.? For one suspects that those American Jews eager to find a reason to vote for Obama may be all too ready to stand convinced of what they are being told.
Recently elected NY Congressman Bob Turner gave an interview in Israel last week, in which he said, ?I think American support militarily has been more an investment in our own defense..?? It was a refreshingly honest and significant observation that directly applies here.
Obama likes to claim ? as he does in this video ? that US military cooperation with Israel makes him a huge supporter of Israel.? But this cooperation serves US needs and goals in important ways: the US requires an Israel that is militarily solid.? Nothing wrong with that.? It means US interests coincide with Israeli interests in this respect. But Obama misrepresents when he claims the US does this for Israel.? And it should be noted here that it is the Pentagon, which understands the military situation,?that has always been the major promoter within the US of cooperation with Israel.
This same principle applies to other, related, matters.? Last year the Israeli embassy in Cairo was attacked.? The ambassador and his staff got out, but two Israeli security guards were caught in the building and in danger of being killed.? Obama (and I note?here there were others from elsewhere involved as well) intervened and helped get those guards out safely.? He then made a great deal about how he worked on Israel?s behalf. ?Nonsense. ?Imagine what would have happened if those guards had been killed, when, according to international law, a country is responsible for the?safety of foreign embassy personnel within its borders.? Israel would have had to respond very strongly ? perhaps there would have been war.? Obama knew this, knew that there was risk of a disastrous turn of events in the?Middle East and he had to try to cool things.? All to the good. But?he didn?t do this for Israel.
Did Israelis, including Netanyahu, thank him for his actions here and elsewhere? Of course. That?s the?diplomatic thing to do.? But the Israeli prime minister did not do so with the expectation that Obama would use this expression of appreciation as an endorsement come election time.? The Obama team merely borrowed an earlier clip and added it to their video. I haven?t discussed this with Netanyahu personally, but I am reasonably confident that?the prime minister is privately praying that Obama loses ? for Obama has been rude to?him and a thorn in his side in many respects.? But it?s neither politic nor appropriate for him to voice any opinion in the matter.
As to Defense Minister Ehud Barak?s praise of Obama, which is given considerable play in the video:? It?s long been known in Israel that Barak is an Obama ?buddy.?? This is a man who is intensely disliked by those Israelis who care about preserving their nation.? Barak is the one who sanctions middle of the night expulsions of people in ?unauthorized? communities in Judea and Samaria, allowing?young children to be dragged from their beds into cold rain.? What Barak says should carry no weight with caring people.
The imagery of Obama at the Kotel, which begins the video, is designed to grab at the heart.? But for some this is more likely to grab the stomach:? Obama has not visited Israel once since he?s been in office ? even though he is a much-traveled president. Where does he travel? To Muslim countries, mostly.?He?had no trouble visiting Indonesia, which is engaged in horrendous human rights violations.? Not a word about that. But from a podium in Indonesia, of all places, he?criticized settlements in Judea and Samaria.? It was no accident ? he was showing Muslims how tough he is with Israel. This is a friend of Israel?
Continue reading page: 1 2
Source: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/27/answering-obamas-israel-lies/
letter from santa sweet potato pie sweet potato pie twas the night before christmas norad santa epic beard man new york jets
Romney more popular than Reagan (at least in the first-name sweepstakes) (Washington Post) no comments
Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/191952720?client_source=feed&format=rss
kc chiefs judy garland duggars j r martinez j r martinez long island serial killer wizard of oz
What You Missed While Not Watching the Florida GOP Debate (Time.com) no comments
Emmanuel Dunand / AFP / Getty Images
Republican presidential hopefuls Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul take part in a debate at the University of South Florida in Tampa on Jan. 23, 2012
0 minutes. TV Guide lists a new episode of Fear Factor at 9 p.m. on NBC. It?s called ?Leaches & Shaved Heads & Tear Gas, Oh My! Part 1.? And yet, as the hour strikes, the screen shows another patriotic montage, this time from Tampa, introducing the 18th Republican debate. The NFL plays a 16-game regular season. There are nine circles of hell. God got it done in six days. But democracy is unrelenting, a bit like Joe Rogan, with less forced regurgitation and fewer critter challenges. Which is to say, Fear Factor has been preempted. A fearful nation takes its place.
2 minutes. Blue gels on the audience again, like Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, except there will be no ?dum-dum-dum,? at least when it comes to sound effects. Brian Williams, the handsomest man to have never been a movie star, is not wasting any time. He lists a lot of bad stuff that former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has been saying about former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. ?Erratic,? ?failed leader,? it goes on. ?Your response tonight, Mr. Speaker??
3 minutes. Gingrich responds by reciting his r?sum?, with extra emphasis on confusing historical analogies that only he knows. He says President Reagan carried ?more states than Herbert Hoover carried ? than Roosevelt carried against Herbert Hoover.? As is often the case with Gingrich, his words form a shield. By the time he gets to ?They?re not sending somebody to Washington to manage the decay,? it?s impossible to remember what was asked.
(PHOTOS: Political Pictures of the Week)
4 minutes. A wide shot shows Romney standing there, next to Gingrich, with his right hand hanging at his side, ready to draw. But dapper Williams tries again with Gingrich, which allows the former Speaker to continue to take credit for everything good that happened during his decades in the House. ?When I was Speaker, we had four consecutive balanced budgets, the only time in your lifetime, Brian, that we?ve had four consecutive balanced budgets.? This is not true. The four years of surplus ran through 2001. Gingrich resigned from office in 1999. Newt gets 2 out of 4. If this were a history class, he would fail.
5 minutes. Romney gets his chance. ?I think it?s about leadership,? he says, ?and the Speaker was given an opportunity to be the leader of our party in 1994. And at the end of four years, he had to resign in disgrace.? This is the same Mitt Romney who said in the last debate that he wished he had spent more time attacking President Obama and less time attacking his rivals. Romney calls Gingrich an ?influence peddler,? says he encouraged cap and trade and called Paul Ryan?s budget plan ?social engineering.?
(PHOTOS: The Rich History of Mitt Romney)
6 minutes. Gingrich, doing his best imitation of Romney, from when Romney was the front runner, acts like he is too big a deal to worry about the criticism. ?Well, look, I?m not going to spend the evening trying to chase Governor Romney?s misinformation,? he says, adding that he would rather be attacking Obama. ?I just think this is the worst kind of trivial politics.?
8 minutes. Williams still looks like how every 1940s radio-drama detective sounded. He asks Romney whether he can appeal to conservatives. Romney says he does, and pivots. ?Let?s go back to what the Speaker mentioned with regard to leadership,? Romney says. He notes that Gingrich was the first Speaker in history to resign. ?I don?t think we can possibly retake the White House if the person who?s leading our party is the person who was working for the chief lobbyist of Freddie Mac,? he adds.
9 minutes. Romney says almost exactly what Gingrich said after Iowa: that the last election taught him he can?t sit back. He has to go on offense. ?I had incoming from all directions, was overwhelmed with a lot of attacks. And I?m not going to sit back and get attacked day in and day out without returning fire,? Romney says. The two men have traded strategies since South Carolina. Or bodies. Gingrich is now aloof and focused on the general. Romney is trying to muddy the field.
10 minutes. Gingrich returns fire with a couple of zingers: ?He may have been a good financier,? he says of Romney. ?He?s a terrible historian.? So is Gingrich. (See minute 4.) Then Gingrich proceeds to respond to a lot of stuff he just said he would not waste his time talking about. He tells a rosy version of his fall from the top of the House that would not please his fellow historians. ?Apparently, your consultants aren?t very good historians,? Gingrich tells Romney. ?What you ought to do is stop and look at the facts.? The intellectual insult. A classic Gingrich move. Like, I know you are, but what am I?
(WATCH: Breaking Down Mitt Romney?s 14% Tax Rate)
11 minutes. Debonair Williams, he of the slender face and half-Windsor knot, throws it to former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, who has apparently been onstage this entire time. How, asks Williams, is Santorum going to win? Santorum hits his stump speech, saying he is positive and that this is not a two-person race.
14 minutes. There is actually a fourth person onstage as well. Texas Representative Ron Paul gets a question that is basically this: You have no chance of winning, you said you don?t envision yourself in the Oval Office, so will you run as a third-party candidate? Paul says he has been winning the under-30 vote and otherwise doing ?pretty darned well.? Then he calls out the historian on his rosy history about giving up the Speaker?s gavel. ?This idea that he voluntarily reneged and he was going to punish himself because we didn?t do well in the election, that?s just not the way it was.? True that. Then Paul says, once again, that he has ?no plans? to go third party.
17 minutes. Gingrich gets a question about Paul. Gingrich praises Paul for his criticism of the Federal Reserve and desire for a ?gold commission,? which is nothing like a blue-ribbon panel. It would study bringing back gold as currency.
18 minutes. Romney says he will release his tax returns for two years on Tuesday morning. But again, he gets tongue-tied. Rich people don?t like to talk about their own money. It is impolite. So Romney says, ?The real question is not so much my taxes, but the taxes of the American people.? Suddenly, out of nowhere, Romney, who previously opposed any debt compromise that raised any taxes, is praising the Bowles-Simpson plan, which raises tax revenues by nearly $1 trillion. But Romney doesn?t talk about the deficit part. He talks about the cutting marginal rates part, which by itself would make the debt problem worse. He chastises Obama for having ?simply brushed aside? the Bowles-Simpson recommendations, in much the same way that Romney previously did.
20 minutes. More discomfort, as Romney is asked again to talk about his money. ?I pay all the taxes that are legally required and not a dollar more,? he says. ?I don?t think you want someone as the candidate for President who pays more taxes than he owes.? Now that is settled.
21 minutes. Gingrich tries to needle Romney by saying he wants everyone to enjoy Romney?s 15% tax rate. Romney points out that under the Gingrich tax plan, investment gains would be taxed at zero. ?Under that plan, I?d have paid no taxes in the last two years,? Romney says. This is true. It is the reason Gingrich?s policies are better for wealthy financiers than Romney?s policies. Romney would keep his own tax rate on investments at 15%.
(PHOTOS: Newt Gingrich?s Life in Pictures)
22 minutes. More awkward talk about Romney?s wealth. ?I will not apologize for having been successful. I did not inherit what my wife and I have, nor did she. What we have, what I was able to build, I built the old-fashioned way, by earning it,? he says. This is true, if you discount the fact that his father?s money helped put Romney through college (Brigham Young, Stanford) and earn joint degrees at Harvard (Law, Business).
25 minutes. Now it?s time to talk about what lobbying means. Gingrich worked for lobbyists at Freddie Mac, a quasi-government agency that conservatives despise. He also took lots of money from health care companies while at the same time writing articles and giving talks that furthered those companies? agendas in Congress. But technically none of it was lobbying, which is a legal term of art. Williams asks the right question, by avoiding the L word. ?You never peddled influence, as Governor Romney accused you of tonight?? Gingrich can?t answer. ?You know, there is a point in the process where it gets unnecessarily personal and nasty,? he says, before avoiding the question by saying he never lobbied.
28 minutes. Romney and Gingrich go at it. Romney accuses Gingrich of profiting from an organization that destroyed the housing market in Florida. Gingrich tries to compare his consulting work for lobbyists with Romney?s consulting work for corporations. ?Wait a second, wait a second,? protests Gingrich at one point, after Romney admits that his firm made money too. ?We didn?t do any work with the government. I didn?t have an office on K Street,? Romney says. It goes on.
33 minutes. Never-a-bad-hair-day Williams cuts them off and goes to commercial break.
36 minutes. We?re back, with charity time for the other two candidates, who have not had much time to talk. Paul and Santorum speak about the housing market and say nothing new. Then Romney says he wants to help homeowners too. And Gingrich says he wants to repeal Dodd-Frank, the banking-regulation bill, because of its effect on smaller banks. Romney agrees.
43 minutes. Cuba question: ?Let?s say President Romney gets that phone call, and it is to say that Fidel Castro has died. And there are credible people in the Pentagon who predict upward of half a million Cubans may take that as a cue to come to the United States. What do you do?? The premise is a stretch, since Fidel has already ceded most of his government control to his brother Ra?l. Romney tries to make a joke about how Fidel is a bad guy. ?First of all, you thank heavens that Fidel Castro has returned to his maker and will be sent to another land,? he says.
44 minutes. Gingrich retells the joke but gets the punch line right. ?Well, Brian, first of all, I guess the only thing I would suggest is, I don?t think that Fidel is going to meet his maker. I think he?s going to go to the other place,? he says. Fidel-in-hell jokes must poll really well in Miami. Then Gingrich says he would authorize ?covert operations? to overthrow the Castro regime.
46 minutes. ?I would do pretty much the opposite,? says Paul.
47 minutes. Having stirred up the Cuba pot, Williams now accuses the candidates of pandering for votes. Why don?t they care as much about Chinese dissidents and embargo China? Santorum says China is not 90 miles off the coast.
49 minutes. Iran time. Romney criticizes Obama: ?We ought to have an aircraft carrier in the Gulf.? Nevermind that the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln is there right now. Gingrich picks up where Romney left off. ?Dictatorships respond to strength. They don?t respond to weakness,? he says. The same can be said of Republican primary voters.
52 minutes. Romney tears into Obama on Afghanistan, saying the President should not have reduced troops to the level that he did, allowed elections to go bad or announced a withdrawal date.
53 minutes. Paul pretty much has the opposite view.
54 minutes. Another break. ?I?ll welcome two colleagues out here to the stage when we continue from Tampa right after this,? says Williams. Hope for Joe Rogan and Donald Trump. Or Alec Baldwin and Tina Fey.
58 minutes. We?re back. It?s National Journal?s Beth Reinhard and the Tampa Bay Times? Adam Smith. After Santorum gets a chance to talk about the evils of Iran, he is asked about offshore drilling. Santorum says the economy in Florida went bad in 2008 ?because of a huge spike in oil prices,? which is like saying people watch Fear Factor to see Joe Rogan.
62 minutes. Reinhard asks a great question: How can the candidates be against bilingual balloting, even as they advertise in Spanish to Hispanics? Gingrich and Romney don?t really have answers. So they dance around the edges. Everyone onstage is against multilingual education, except Paul, who doesn?t mind if states do whatever they want.
66 minutes. Immigration time. Same as before, except Gingrich makes clear that he would support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants who serve in the military. Romney agrees. Then Romney says of other undocumented immigrants, ?Well, the answer is self-deportation, which is, people decide they can do better by going home because they can?t find work here, because they don?t have legal documentation to allow them to work here.? Self-deportation is one of those neologisms that gets added to the dictionary at the end of the year. Sign of the times.
70 minutes. Questions about sugar subsidies. Gingrich says you can?t beat the sugar lobby, because ?cane sugar hides behind beet sugar,? and there are ?just too many beet-sugar districts in the United States.? Surely someone can work that into a haiku.
71 minutes. Romney says he is against all subsidies. Then he pivots into a long rant about the awfulness of Obama. It is telling that it has taken Romney 71 minutes to get into this rant on Obama. South Carolina transformed him as a candidate.
72 minutes. Paul is asked if he supports federal funding for conservation of the everglades. He lets down his strict libertarian guard to pander for Florida votes. ?I don?t see any reason to go after that,? he says.
73 minutes. Another break. Things are speeding up.
77 minutes. Some talk about Terri Schiavo, the woman in a vegetative state who became a cause c?l?bre for conservatives in 2005. The answers are inconsequential.
81 minutes. Space-cadet time. No, really. Romney says Obama has no space plan, and America needs a space plan. Gingrich is asked about going to Mars. He says he wants a ?leaner NASA,? but then shares a terribly expensive list of goals: ?Going back to the moon permanently, getting to Mars as rapidly as possible, building a series of space stations and developing commercial space.? At least something new is happening. First time in 18 debates that anyone has talked about Mars.
84 minutes. Gingrich is asked why the Bush tax cuts in the early 2000s did not create a lot of jobs. His answer is priceless. He channels Obama, seemingly unaware of the irony. ?In 2002 and ?03 and ?04, we?d have been in much worse shape without the Bush tax cuts,? he says. That?s what Obama says about the stimulus bill. Both are basically right, though neither would give the other credit.
85 minutes. Last break. Almost there. Actually, scratch that. You will never get there. When this debate ends, there will be another. The next one is on Thursday. No joke.
90 minutes. We?re back. Romney is asked what he has done to further the cause of conservatism. He is sort of stumped. Talks about his family and his work in the private sector, neither of which is ideological.
92 minutes. Gingrich talks about how he went to Goldwater meetings in 1964, when he would have turned 21.
93 minutes. Santorum is asked about electability. Suddenly he comes alive. It?s the best moment of any of his debates. Yet few will ever notice, and it will almost certainly not matter. He makes the case that he is the only true conservative who can take on Obama, and that both Romney and Gingrich are fundamentally flawed because they are too close to the political positions of Obama. ?There is no difference between President Obama and these two gentlemen,? Santorum says. This is not true, if you were wondering.
95 minutes. Paul talks about the Constitution.
97 minutes. Romney talks about RomneyCare and ObamaCare.
98 minutes. Gingrich says, ?I never ask anyone to be for me. Because if they are for me, they vote yes and go home and say, I sure hope Newt does it. I ask people to be with me, because I think this will be a very hard, very difficult journey.? No doubt.
99 minutes. Romney, who talks all the time about ?restoring American greatness,? is asked when America was last great. ?America still is great,? Romney says, thus undercutting the meaning of his signature campaign message.
101 minutes. That?s it. See you Thursday.
nicki minaj barbie doll black dahlia drew drew lady gaga marry the night video lady gaga marry the night video pac 12 championship game
Giffords resigns House seat to focus on recovery no comments
This video image provided by House Television shows Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz. on the floor of the House on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2012. Giffords resigned from the House on Wednesday amid tears, tributes and standing ovations, more than a year after she was gravely wounded by a would-be assassin. (AP Photo/House Television)
This video image provided by House Television shows Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz. on the floor of the House on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2012. Giffords resigned from the House on Wednesday amid tears, tributes and standing ovations, more than a year after she was gravely wounded by a would-be assassin. (AP Photo/House Television)
This video image provided by House Television shows Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., accompanied by Democratic National Committee Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., walks on the floor of the House on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2012. Giffords resigned from the House on Wednesday amid tears, tributes and standing ovations, more than a year after she was gravely wounded by a would-be assassin. (AP Photo/House Television)
This video image provided by House Television shows Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz. and House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, on the floor of the House on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2012. Giffords resigned from the House on Wednesday amid tears, tributes and standing ovations, more than a year after she was gravely wounded by a would-be assassin. (AP Photo/House Television)
WASHINGTON (AP) ? In a House occasionally known for untoward exits, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords stood among cheering, crying colleagues to say goodbye Wednesday, over a year after she was gravely wounded by a would-be assassin.
Giffords had come to the well of the chamber to resign, a formality since she’d signaled her intention earlier, as she recovers from a gunshot wound to the head during a shooting rampage in her home district in Arizona. It was one of the longer House goodbyes in recent times, as Democrats and Republicans lined up to see her off. A prolonged standing ovation followed a fusion of tributes and tears as colleagues praised her dignity and perseverance.
Surrounded by friends and colleagues and holding Rep. Jeff Flake’s hand, Giffords heard her close friend, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, read her resignation letter to the chamber. In it, Giffords said she had “more work to do on my recovery before I can again serve in elected office.”
Last January, a gunman opened fire at Giffords’ “Congress on Your Corner” event in Tucson, killing six people and wounding 13, including Giffords who suffered the gunshot wound.
“I don’t remember much from that terrible day, but I have never forgotten my constituents, my colleagues or the millions of Americans with whom I share great hopes for this nation,” Giffords said in the letter to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.
After reading it, an emotional Wasserman Schultz helped Giffords slowly make her way to the podium where she handed the letter to a teary-eyed Boehner.
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Giffords had become “an inspiring symbol of determination and courage to millions of Americans … Her message of bipartisanship and civility is one that all in Washington and in the nation should emulate.”
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said Giffords’ “strength against all odds serves and will continue to serve as a daily inspiration to all of us.”
Moments later, the House, including Giffords, voted for her final piece of legislation ? a bill that would impose tougher penalties on smugglers who use small, low-flying aircraft to avoid radar detection and bring drugs across the Mexican border.
The vote was 408-0.
Giffords submitted resignation letters to both Boehner and Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, but it isn’t effective until the end of the day.
It falls to Brewer to set a date for a special primary and general election to fill the Arizona seat. That will probably happen in the spring or early summer. In November, voters will choose someone for the full two-year term.
Whoops, cheers and sustained standing ovations greeted Giffords’ arrival in the chamber. Holding Wasserman Shultz’ arm, the congresswoman moved down the center aisle, receiving kisses and hugs from her colleagues.
Her mother, Gloria, and husband, retired Navy Capt. Mark Kelly, watched from the gallery. Giffords had announced on Sunday in a Web video that she would resign her seat.
“She realized she was not going to run for re-election and this point the right thing to do was for her to step down,” Kelly said after the emotional event on the House floor. “But I’m more optimistic than anybody else about her future. She just needs some more time, whether it’s a year or two years or three years, I’m very confident she’s going to have a long and effective career as a public servant.”
Asked about her daughter’s future, Gloria Giffords said, “I kind of think she’s transcended Congress. I don’t know where she’s going to end up.”
“She’s remembered every boy she’s ever kissed, every song she’s ever sang, every bill she’s ever passed,” she said. “So upward and onward.”
___
Associated Press writers Alan Fram and Jim Abrams contributed to this report.
Associated Press
repudiate avengers joost joost how to get ios 5 how to get ios 5 eric holder
Paterno loses battle with lung cancer no comments
Legenday Penn State coach, 85, leads all in college wins
Getty Images
Penn State coach Joe Paterno celebrates his 324th career win after defeating Ohio State on Oct. 27, 2001.
By GENARO C. ARMAS
updated 12:38 p.m. ET Jan. 22, 2012
STATE COLLEGE, Pa. – Joe Paterno, the longtime Penn State coach who won more American football games than anyone in major college history but was fired amid a child sex abuse scandal that scarred his reputation for winning with integrity, died Sunday. He was 85.
His family released a statement Sunday morning to announce his death: “His loss leaves a void in our lives that will never be filled.”
“He died as he lived,” the statement said. “He fought hard until the end, stayed positive, thought only of others and constantly reminded everyone of how blessed his life had been. His ambitions were far reaching, but he never believed he had to leave this Happy Valley to achieve them. He was a man devoted to his family, his university, his players and his community.”
Two police officers were stationed to block traffic on the street where Paterno’s modest ranch home stands next to a local park. The officers said the family had asked there be no public gathering outside the house, still decorated with a Christmas wreath, so Paterno’s relatives could grieve privately. And, indeed, the street was quiet on a cold winter day.
Paterno’s sons, Scott and Jay, arrived separately at the house late Sunday morning. Jay Paterno, who served as his father’s quarterbacks coach, was crying.
Paterno built his program on the credo “Success with Honor,” and he found both. The man known as “JoePa” won 409 games and took the Nittany Lions to 37 bowl games and two national championships. More than 250 of the players he coached went on to the NFL.
“He will go down as the greatest football coach in the history of the game,” Ohio State coach Urban Meyer said after his former team, the Florida Gators, beat Penn State 37-24 in the 2011 Outback Bowl.
Paterno’s son Scott said on Nov. 18 that his father was being treated for lung cancer. The cancer was diagnosed during a follow-up visit for a bronchial illness. A few weeks after that revelation, Paterno also broke his pelvis after a fall but did not need surgery.
Paterno had been in the hospital since Jan. 13 for observation for what his family had called minor complications from his cancer treatments. Not long before that, he conducted his only interview since losing his job, with The Washington Post. Paterno was described as frail then, speaking mostly in a whisper and wearing a wig. The second half of the two-day interview was conducted at his bedside.
“As the last 61 years have shown, Joe made an incredible impact,” said the statement from the family. “That impact has been felt and appreciated by our family in the form of thousands of letters and well wishes along with countless acts of kindness from people whose lives he touched. It is evident also in the thousands of successful student athletes who have gone on to multiply that impact as they spread out across the country.”
The final days of Paterno’s Penn State career were easily the toughest in his 61 years with the university and 46 seasons as head football coach.
It was because Paterno was a such a sainted figure ? more memorable than any of his players and one of the best-known coaches in all of sports ? that his downfall was so startling. During one breathtaking week in early November, Paterno was engulfed by a scandal and forced from his job, because he failed to go to the police in 2002 when told a young boy was molested inside the football complex.
“I didn’t know which way to go … and rather than get in there and make a mistake,” he said in the Post interview.
Jerry Sandusky, the former defensive coordinator expected to succeed Paterno before retiring in 1999, was charged with sexually assaulting 10 boys over 15 years. Two university officials stepped down after they were charged with perjury following a grand jury investigation of Sandusky. But attention quickly focused on an alleged rape that took place in a shower in the football building, witnessed by Mike McQueary, a graduate assistant at the time.
McQueary testified that he had seen Sandusky attacking the child and that he had told Paterno, who waited a day before alerting school authorities. Police were never called and the state’s top cop later said Paterno failed to execute his moral responsibility by not contacting police.
“You know, (McQueary) didn’t want to get specific,” Paterno said in the Post interview. “And to be frank with you I don’t know that it would have done any good, because I never heard of, of, rape and a man. So I just did what I thought was best. I talked to people that I thought would be, if there was a problem, that would be following up on it.”
On the morning of Nov. 9, Paterno said he would retire following the 2011 season. He also said he was “absolutely devastated” by the abuse case.
“This is a tragedy,” the coach said. “It is one of the great sorrows of my life. With the benefit of hindsight, I wish I had done more.”
But the university trustees faced a crisis, and in an emergency meeting that night, they fired Paterno, effective immediately. Graham Spanier, one of the longest-serving university presidents in the nation, also was dismissed.
According to Lanny Davis, an attorney retained by the trustees as an adviser, board vice chairman John Surma regretted having to tell Paterno the decision over the phone.
The university handed the football team to one of Paterno’s assistants, Tom Bradley, who said Paterno “will go down in history as one of the greatest men, who maybe most of you know as a great football coach.”
Thick, smoky-lens glasses, rolled up khakis, jet-black sneakers, blue windbreaker ? Paterno was easy to spot on the sidelines. His teams were just as easy to spot on the field; their white helmets and classic blue and white uniforms had the same old-school look as the coach.
Paterno believed success was not measured entirely on the field. From his idealistic early days, he had implemented what he called a “grand experiment” ? to graduate more players while maintaining success on the field.
He was a frequent speaker on ethics in sports, a conscience for a world often infiltrated by scandal and shady characters.
His teams consistently ranked among the best in the Big Ten for graduating players. As of 2011, it had 49 academic All-Americans, the third-highest among schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision. All but two played under Paterno.
“He teaches us about really just growing up and being a man,” former linebacker Paul Posluszny, now with the NFL’s Jacksonville Jaguars, once said. “Besides the football, he’s preparing us to be good men in life.”
Paterno certainly had detractors, as well. One former Penn State professor called his high-minded words on academics a farce. He was criticized for making broad critiques about the wrongs in college football without providing specifics. A former administrator said his players often got special treatment compared to non-athletes. His coaching style often was considered too conservative. Some thought he held on to his job too long. There was a push to move him out in 2004 but it failed.
But the critics were in the minority, and his program was never cited for major NCAA violations. However, the child sexual abuse scandal prompted separate investigations by the U.S. Department of Education and the NCAA into the school’s handling.
Paterno played quarterback and cornerback for Brown University and set a defensive record with 14 career interceptions, a distinction he boasted about to his teams all the way into his 80s. He graduated in 1950 with plans to go to law school. He said his father hoped he would someday be president.
When he was 23, a former coach at Brown was moving to Penn State to become the head coach and persuaded Paterno to come with him as an assistant.
“I had no intention to coach when I got out of Brown,” Paterno said in 2007 at Beaver Stadium in an interview before being inducted into the Hall of Fame. “Come to this hick town? From Brooklyn?”
In 1963, he was offered a job by the late Al Davis ? $18,000, triple his salary at Penn State, plus a car to become general manager and coach of the AFL’s Oakland Raiders. He said no. Rip Engle retired as Penn State head coach three years later, and Paterno took over.
At the time, the Lions were considered “Eastern football” ? inferior ? and Paterno courted newspaper coverage to raise the team’s profile. In 1967, PSU began a 30-0-1 streak.
But Penn State couldn’t get to the top of the polls. The Lions finished second in 1968 and 1969 despite perfect records. They went 12-0 in 1973 and finished fifth. Texas edged them in 1969 after President Richard Nixon, impressed with the Longhorns’ bowl performance, declared them No. 1.
“I’d like to know,” Paterno said later, “how could the president know so little about Watergate in 1973, and so much about college football in 1969?”
A national title finally came in 1982, in a 27-23 win over Georgia at the Sugar Bowl. Penn State won another in 1986 after the Lions picked off Vinny Testaverde five times and beat Miami 14-10 in the Fiesta Bowl.
They have made several title runs since then, including a 2005 run to the Orange Bowl and an 11-1 campaign in 2008 that earned them a berth in the Rose Bowl, where they lost 37-23 to Southern California.
advertisement
Source: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/46085007/ns/sports-college_football/
eat to live ron paul money bomb ron paul money bomb bon vivant zynga ipo zynga ipo joe arpaio
The nation’s weather (AP) no comments
Wet and snowy weather will persist in the West as snow returns Sunday to the Northern Plains and upper Midwest. A strong low pressure system spinning over the Pacific will push another cold front onshore throughout the day. This system will bring rain showers to the Pacific Northwest and northern California, with heavy snow showers expected in the mountains. The Cascades may see 3 to 7 inches of new snow, and the Sierra Nevadas another 7 to 9 inches of snow.
Strong winds will develop ahead of this front, with gusts from 35 to 45 mph, up to 75 mph at the highest mountain peaks. High wind and winter weather advisories remain in effect in these areas.
Elsewhere, a low pressure system over the central and northern Rockies will advance eastward into the Plains, producing 1 to 3 inches of snow across the Dakotas and upper Midwest. Late Sunday, a cold front will develop south of this system, bringing scattered showers and thunderstorms to the Mississippi River Valley. There is a slight chance storms will turn severe in the Tennessee Valley and mid-Mississippi River valley. The back side of this system will spread lingering snow showers over the Rockies.
The East Coast will see a break in wet weather as a low pressure system and associated frontal boundary moves offshore into the Atlantic. High pressure will build over the Northeast and extend down the East Coast, allowing for a dry and mild day before another system quickly approaches from the central U.S.
Temperatures in the lower 48 states ranged Saturday from a morning low of -25 degrees at Land O’ Lakes, Wis., to a high of 91 degrees at Bonifay, Fla.
___
Online:
Weather Underground: http://www.wunderground.com
National Weather Service: http://iwin.nws.noaa.gov
Intellicast: http://www.intellicast.com
americas got talent tyler perry tupac tupac shakur nfl power rankings houston news us news and world report college rankings
Romney to release his tax returns on Tuesday (AP) no comments
WASHINGTON ? Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Sunday that he will release his 2010 tax returns and 2011 estimates on Tuesday, acknowledging it was a mistake for his campaign not to have done so earlier.
Stung by a loss to Newt Gingrich in Saturday’s South Carolina primary, the former Massachusetts governor and venture capitalist said it was “not a good week for me” and he cited all the time he had spent talking about his tax returns as his rivals pressed him to make them public.
After months of resistance, Romney had said last week that he would release tax information for 2011, but not until April, close to the tax filing deadline. That also was seen as a time, before the South Carolina race rattled his front-runner status, when the GOP nomination might have been decided.
“I think we just made a mistake in holding off as long as we did. It just was a distraction. We want to get back to the real issues of the campaign: leadership, character, a vision for America, how to get jobs again in America and how to rein in the excessive scale of the federal government,” Romney told “Fox News Sunday.”
Romney disclosed on Tuesday that, despite his wealth of hundreds of millions of dollars, he has been paying in the neighborhood of 15 percent, far below the top maximum income tax rate of 35 percent, because his income “comes overwhelmingly from investments made in the past.”
“Given all the attention that’s been focused on tax returns, given the distraction that I think they became in these last couple of weeks,” Romney said in the broadcast interview that he would release his 2010 returns and estimates for his 2011 returns at the same time “so there’s not a second release down the road.”
“We’ll be putting our returns on the Internet, people can look through them,” Romney said. “It will provide, I think, plenty of information for people to understand that the sources of my income are exactly as described in the financial disclosure statements we put out a couple of months ago.
During 2010 and the first nine months of 2011, the Romney family had at least $9.6 million in income, according to a financial disclosure form submitted in August.
Further focusing attention on his wealth was Romney’s offhand remark to reporters that his income from paid speeches amounted to “not very much” money. In the August disclosure statement, he reported being paid $373,327.62 for such appearances for the 12 months ending last February. That sum alone would him in the top 1 percent of U.S. taxpayers.
In addition, Romney owns investments worth between $7 million and $32 million in offshore-based holdings, which are often used legitimately by private equity firms to attract foreign investors. Such offshore accounts also can enable wealthy investors to defer paying U.S. taxes on some assets, according to tax experts.
An Associated Press examination of Romney’s financial records identified at least six funds set up in the Cayman Islands, a small Caribbean island chain that has long been used as a base for international investments because of low tax rates and financial secrecy. Romney has acknowledged that some of his investments are based in the Caymans, but he has not identified all of the specific accounts and the amounts based there. There is no indication Romney uses the accounts to dodge any U.S. tax obligations.
“Cayman Islands account so-to-speak is apparently an investment that was made in an entity that invests in the United States, the taxes paid on that are full U.S. taxes,” Romney said.
The Caymans have often been associated with individuals and corporations seeking to avoid paying U.S. taxes. It is legal for U.S. residents to own investment accounts that are set up there, if they file the proper forms with the Internal Revenue Service and pay the appropriate taxes.
“I know people will try and find something,” Romney said, adding, “We pay full, fair taxes, and you’ll see it’s a pretty substantial amount.”
fracking fracking drosselmeyer drosselmeyer pacific standard time local time when is daylight savings 2011
Senator Rand Paul detained by airport security (reuters) no comments
Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/190456017?client_source=feed&format=rss
michael oher marist glenn miller south carolina primary results marco scutaro betty white chad ochocinco
Costa Concordia Disaster: Dozens Of Countries Worried About Passengers no comments
PORTO SANTO STEFANO, Italy — Language barriers, overwhelmed local authorities, squads of foreign diplomats with lists of awkward questions ? the international mix of passengers and crew aboard the stricken Costa Concordia cruise liner added to the complications Saturday for Italian officials handling the emergency.
Local authorities were fielding inquiries from dozens of nations worried about the 4,234 people who were aboard the ship when it ran aground and tipped over off the coast of Italy, including Italians, Germans, French people, Britons and Americans, and about 1,000 crew members from across the globe.
As international travel has grown easier, aid agencies and lawmakers alike have frequently warned of the potential for confusion in the wake of international emergencies, as sometimes competing nations or international organizations arrive at a disaster site.
In Italy, a host of countries sent diplomatic staff to the scene as three bodies were recovered from the sea off the tiny island of Giglio, close to the coast of Tuscany.
British ambassador Christopher Prentice said he had seen his counterparts from Germany and Spain at local hospitals, where diplomats were checking identities and tallying numbers of those injured.
Officials from the U.K. and Australia set up a joint base at Porto Santo Stefano middle school, which had been transformed into a temporary holding center for rescued passengers.
Though the school was a scene of chaos, as passengers tried to find buses to take them back to Rome or the coastal town of Savona ? where most had embarked ? and embassy officials cross-referenced ship logs and passenger lists, Prentice said nations were cooperating well.
“This is obviously a very serious and major incident, my impression at this stage is that the Italian authorities have responded excellently and our cooperation with them has been very good,” Prentice said, as he offered advice to Britons at the school.
Other embassies sent lower-level officials to work with the ship operator Costa and local authorities, offering help to foreign passengers who didn’t speak Italian and were struggling to understand the response to the accident or how to get home.
Consular officials wore bright green or orange emergency vests to identify themselves to their co-nationals, offering help in how to obtain emergency passports, since many non-Europeans had to turn them in to cruise officials upon boarding.
Prentice said that in a still unfolding crisis scenario, good coordination was key. “It is about cooperation, and things are being done here very calmly and sensibly, I’ve been impressed by the effort of the Italian authorities,” he said.
As nations were still attempting to confirm the identities of passengers who had been rescued from the ship, rescuers focused on several dozen people still unaccounted for.
Monty Mathisen, of the New York-based publication Cruise Industry News, said Costa would be well prepared to handle the demands of countries searching for news of the passengers and crew.
“They are well set up to deal with those kind of issues,” said Mathisen. “The cruise industry is one of most regulated industries.”
Marcus Oxley, then disaster management director of the relief charity Tearfund told a committee of British lawmakers in 2006 of the nightmare confronting local authorities as organizations descend on an area requesting information, or offering help.
“In the white hot heat of an emergency these things are extraordinarily difficult to do,” he said.
______
Stringer reported from London.
View of the Costa Concordia taken on January 14, 2012, after the cruise ship ran aground and keeled over off the Isola del Giglio, last night. Three people died and about 70 were missing Saturday after an Italian cruise ship with more than 4,000 people on board ran aground and keeled over, sparking scenes of panic. AFP PHOTO/FILIPPO MONTEFORTE
View of the Costa Concordia taken on January 14, 2012, after the cruise ship ran aground and keeled over off the Isola del Giglio, last night. Three people died and about 70 were missing Saturday after an Italian cruise ship with more than 4,000 people on board ran aground and keeled over, sparking scenes of panic. AFP PHOTO/FILIPPO MONTEFORTE
MORE SLIDESHOWS
View of the Costa Concordia taken on January 14, 2012, after the cruise ship ran aground and keeled over off the Isola del Giglio, last night. Three people died and about 70 were missing Saturday after an Italian cruise ship with more than 4,000 people on board ran aground and keeled over, sparking scenes of panic. AFP PHOTO/FILIPPO MONTEFORTE
“; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’}); });
Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/14/costa-concordia-disaster-_0_n_1206540.html
rumpelstiltskin occupy oakland occupy oakland yahoo.com/mail david nelson david nelson frank miller
Balloon Juice ? Can ordinary people get some legal protections … no comments
Soonergrunt wrote that O?Keefe and his co-conspirators may have violated federal law by impersonating people who had recently died in New Hampshire, but it looks to me like they violated state law, too:
Here?s the process for obtaining a ballot in New Hampshire:
1.A voter shall announce their name to the Ballot Clerk.
2.The Ballot Clerk shall repeat the name loud enough for the voter and any challengers to hear.
3.The Ballot Clerk shall search for the voter?s name on the checklist.
4.If the Ballot Clerk finds the voter?s name on the checklist, the ballot clerk shall put a checkmark next to the voter?s name, and again, repeat the voter?s name.
5.The Ballot Clerk shall state the voter?s address.
6.If the voter?s address has changed and is still within the town or ward, the Ballot Clerks shall change the address in red on the paper checklist.
7.The voter should confirm the name and address with the Ballot Clerk.
I viewed the video but it is chopped up so it?s (of course) not reliable and shouldn?t be considered fact. Presenting this as fact is unfair to the ordinary people depicted in the video, because their statements and actions are taken out of sequence and sections are omitted. Presenting this as fact is unfair to readers or viewers for the same reasons.
In any event, I don?t know if they violated state law, because I don?t know what they (actually) said and I don?t know what the pollworker (actually) said, but here?s some New Hampshire law:
659:34 Wrongful Voting; Penalties for Voter Fraud. ? I. A person is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 if such person: (a) When registering to vote; when obtaining an official ballot; or when casting a vote by official ballot, makes a false material statement regarding his or her qualifications as a voter to an election officer or submits a voter registration form, an election day registration affidavit, a qualified voter affidavit, a domicile affidavit, or an absentee registration affidavit containing false material information regarding his or her qualifications as a voter; (b) Votes more than once for any office or measure; (c) Applies for a ballot in a name other than his or her own; (d) Applies for a ballot in his or her own name after he or she has voted once; (e) Votes for any office or measure at an election if such person is not qualified to vote as provided in RSA 654; or (f) Gives a false name or answer if under examination as to his or her qualifications as a voter before the supervisors of the checklist or moderator. II. A person is guilty of a class B felony if, at any election, such person purposefully or knowingly commits an act specified in subparagraph I(b). A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if, at any election, such person purposefully or knowingly commits any of the other acts listed in paragraph I.
We?ll see if this is pursued and anything comes from it. I certainly hope so.
I?m wondering how the families of these recently deceased people feel about conservatives using their family member names in this manner. Anyone is fair game for the media professionals at the Daily Caller or Andrew Breitbart, apparently. They?d use any one of us like this. Ordinary people in New Hampshire, going about their business in good faith, and conservatives swoop in and use them as political pawns and to promote their own careers. It?s absolutely disgusting. This isn?t truth to power. This is paid conservative hacks harassing ordinary people who don?t have a godamnned dog in this fight and didn?t agree to be conscripted into the Right Wing Army. The Brave Men of Conservatism don?t mind some colateral damage to civilians when waging their war on voting.
I hope major media, including the New York Times, are proud of themselves for caving to pressure from conservative activists and donors and promoting and marketing this scumbag who poses as a ?journalist?. They created him, by presenting his carefully orchestrated and edited video ?stings? as fact, never mind that doing so smeared and defamed the low-level ACORN workers who were used in the videos. I guess it will now be up to law enforcement to protect ordinary people from Right wing celebrities and media outlets.
January 12, 2012 10:37 am
Posted?in:?Assholes
?
10 Comments
breeders cup hamilton park brian wilson freedom writers lemony snicket lemony snicket jim thome
